Isabel Anderson started her career as an author with the publication in 1909 of The Great Sea Horse, a large and complex project that took several years to complete. The 25 short stories in Sea Horse are populated with mermaids and “merboys,” seashells, fairies, flowers, gnomes, and human-like creatures called “brownies and pinkies.” The stories are amusing and inventive. If the book were again available in print, it would surely captivate young readers. The upcoming book-length dual biography, Larz and Isabel Anderson: Wealth and Celebrity in the Gilded Age by Skip Moskey, will include an extensive discussion of Isabel’s books across several genres.
Fortunately, many of Isabel’s works have been scanned and are available for on-line reading at the Internet Archive, a non-profit library of millions of free books, movies, software, music, and more. The full text of The Great Sea Horse is available by clicking HERE.
The book cover shown above is a scan of a very special copy of The Great Sea Horse that was once owned by Isabel’s lifelong friend and mentor, Maud Howe Elliott and now in the collection of the Andersons’ biographer, Skip Moskey. In 1940, Maud gave her copy of the book to her godson, Peter C. Thorp, as a Christmas gift.
Anderson House, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC., 1905, designed by the Boston architectural firm of Arthur Little & Herbert Brown. (Photo by Skip Moskey.)
Did you know that, like people, buildings have their own “genealogy”? I’m not talking about the style of a house (such as Gothic Revival, Art Deco, or International), nor am I talking about who has owned the house over time, though both of those things are important to fully understanding and appreciating the historical context of a building.
When I talk about the genealogy of a building, I’m interested in what its architectural antecedents were: what historical edifices might have served as models or ideas for the architect, or what historic homes might have inspired the owner to build a house of a particular style with particular features? Indeed, that was a question I asked myself almost ten years ago when I first visited a prominent historic house in Washington, DC — and ultimately became the biographer of both the house and its occupants.
The building I visited a decade ago is the Isabel and Larz Anderson House (known locally in Washington as Anderson House), built between 1902 and 1905 as the winter “party palace” of Boston author and philanthropist Isabel Weld Perkins Anderson (1876-1948), and her socialite husband Larz Kilgour Anderson (1866-1937). The construction cost of the mansion in 1905 was $750,000 (approximately $20 million today), with another $100,000 ($2.5 million) being spent on interior decoration and furnishings. The money to fund this construction project came entirely from Isabel’s trust fund of approximately $5.5 million ($141 million) which suggests that “The Isabel Anderson House” would be a more appropriate moniker for the residence. But I digress…
The question of which historical antecedents inspired Larz Anderson and his architects has been complicated by confusion in the literature on the actual architectural style of the house. When the house was completed in 1905, the Washington Post reported its architectural style as Florentine Villa, a mistake that continued well into the 20th century, when the 1994 (third) edition of The AIA Guide to the Architecture of Washington, D.C. labeled it an Italianate Palace. The AIA later changed their classification to neo-English Baroque [=early English Baroque] in its 2012 (5th) edition of the AIA Guide, an ornate style of architecture that is definitely not applicable to Anderson House. This error by the AIA is remarkable, because architectural historians Pamela Scott and Antoinette Lee had gotten it right almost two decades earlier in their 1993 encyclopedic survey Buildings of the District of Columbia, where they correctly classified Anderson House as English late Baroque.
Lansdowne House, Westminster. Print by E. William Brayley, ca. 1820.
Around 1900 or 1901, when Larz Anderson started a conversation with the Boston architects Arthur Little and Herbert Browne about building a house in Washington, he almost certainly had London’s Lansdowne House in mind as an inspiration for the winter residence he wanted to build in the nation’s capital. The London townhouse was built in 1765 according to designs by Robert Adam, and Larz knew it well. He had visited it often a decade earlier, during the years that he was a junior diplomat at the American legation in London in the 1890s. Lansdowne House was the London town home of Mr. and Mrs. William Waldorf Astor during the time that Mr. Astor lived in self-imposed exile in England after a run-in with THE Mrs. Astor over who should be the “official” Mrs. Astor in New York. (His aunt, Mrs. William Backhouse Astor, Jr. (née Schermerhorn), won the battle.)
A drawing room in Lansdowne House, ca. 1915. The room must have looked something like this around the time that Larz Anderson was visiting the Astors here in the 1890s. A contemporary photo of this room, which was saved from destruction in 1931, follows. In 1931, the wings of Lansdowne House were demolished. Fortunately, some of the rooms were saved. The drawing room (shown above in a contemporary photograph) was acquired by the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Note that the 19th century flocked wallpaper shown in the 1915 photo has been removed, and the room returned to its original color scheme. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York city acquired the dining room, and it is now on display there.
Lansdowne’s exterior and interior design, and its connection to one of the most powerful American families of the 19th century, the Astors, clearly made an impression on the young American diplomat, who had dreams of his own future greatness as an American ambassador. (The story of Larz’s checkered career in American diplomacy is told for the first time in Larz and Isabel Anderson: Wealth and Celebrity in the Gilded Age.) In his diaries, Larz recorded his visits with the Astors at Lansdowne House, during a period of his life when he was making frequent visits to other great houses of London and the English countryside. Since those other homes go largely un-mentioned in his diaries, it’s clear that for Larz, Lansdowne House had a particular appeal, perhaps as much for its “American royalty” occupants as for the architecture of the house itself. [1]
Lansdowne House, ca. 1920.
When one compares Anderson and Lansdowne houses, there are many similarities in massing and arrangement of structural and decorative elements, including an impressive pediment, pilasters, hipped roofs, and even the placement of chimneys. But the subsidiary wings of Lansdowne (seen more clearly in the illustration above) are not articulated forward as they are in Anderson House. There are, however, many examples of such articulation in other English houses; for example, Clarendon House in London (1664-1667) and Belton House in Lincolnshire (1685).
Clarendon House, London, 1664-1667 (Destroyed 1683) Belton House, Grantham, Lincolnshire, 1685 Anderson House, 2010 (Photo by Greg Tinius)
Though Larz had extensive exposure to English architecture and landscape design as a consequence of his long residence in England during his years as a diplomat there, he had an even more significant exposure to French and Italian culture. Larz’s almost accidental birth in Paris in 1866 during his parents’ 18-month wedding trip was the source of his life-long interest in all things French, though (unlike Isabel) he was not particularly fluent in the language. [2] Though a late English Baroque style of country home provided Larz with the size and stature that he wanted for his in-town residence in Washington, it’s almost certain that he looked to Paris for decorative touches that would reflect his “French connection.”
There are several important architectural elements of Anderson House that were inspired by Parisian townhomes. To understand this more clearly, start by comparing the Greg Tinius photo of Anderson House with the photo of Belton House just above it. All of the significant differences between Belton and Anderson houses can be traced to French antecedents: the entryway, pediment, and portico (See below). Indeed, it is the French influence on Anderson House that ultimately creates a truly artistic effect and gives the house a unique architectural personality. Were it not for these very French elements, Anderson House as a pure example of late English Baroque architecture (i.e., without French accents) might seem more pedestrian and more predictable. The French touches in the exterior of the house create texture and depth that would otherwise be missing from a purely-English structure such as Belton House.
If Anderson House were a person, I think it would be fair to say that though English is its native language, it speaks the language of Shakespeare with a slight Parisian accent and a vocabulary chosen from the language of Molière.
Gallery: French Influences on Anderson House
Entryway
Entryway to the forecourt of Anderson House (1902-1905). Larz wanted a forecourt that could be closed off from the street to accommodate the privacy and security needs of visiting heads of state and royalty. In fact, the house was used only once for such a visit, when the King and Queen of Siam stayed at Anderson House in 1931. The twin entryways of Anderson House could be closed with massive wooden doors that recently (2018) were restored. Entryway to the forecourt of the Hôtel Libéral Bruant (1685), 1 Rue de la Perle, Paris 3ème. The gated forecourt of the Bruant provided security and privacy at a time when there were no public police services. Wealthy residents of the city relied on the design of their home to shield it from activity in the street.
Pediment
The pediment of Anderson House, seen from a third-floor bedroom window. The pediment incorporates the eagle crest designed by Pierre L’Enfant as the emblem of the Society of the Cincinnati. The eagle is set against a mantling of war symbols: spears, battle-axes, fasces with axes, and Roman military ensigns mounted by eagles. If Larz wanted to imply that he, like his ancestors, saw battle in defense of the Republic, this hawkish pediment certainly did so. (Photo by Skip Moskey 2013.) The Bruant again provides a historical antecedent for the exterior decoration of Anderson House. Note the similarities: a highly decorated pediment, a round niche containing classically-inspired sculpture, and gracefully elongaged French windows. At Anderson House, the windows functioned as access to the balcony above the portico.
Portico
The Portico of Anderson House. The obvious architectural antecedent here is the White House, perhaps reflecting Larz’s own political ambitions. In 1916, Larz was briefly considered as a possible vice presidential running mate for Charles Evans Hughes Sr. Larz either declined or the offer was withdrawn. Hughes ran with Charles W. Fairbanks as his running mate, and lost to Woodrow Wilson. The South Portico of the White House, added in 1824, was photographed in 1848 by James Plumbe. The design of the portico, however, was not without precedent. The White House portico is an almost exact copy of one in France, the Château de Rastignac. The portico of the Château de Rastignac (ca. 1789, completed 1812-1817 during the waning years of the Napoleonic era, just before the Bourbon Restoration.) Thomas Jefferson is said to have traveled in the Dordogne-Bordeaux region where the Rastignac is located and may have brought back the idea for the portico. In any event, even if Larz had the White House in mind when he directed his architects to include a portico in the design of Anderson House, the antecedent is decidedly French!
This essay was adapted from “A Tale of Two Houses: The Architecture and Interior Decoration of Washington’s Townsend and Anderson Residences,” a lecture that I and art historian Dr. Isabel Taube of New York City co-presented to the Cosmos Club Historical Preservation Foundation in Washington, DC, on November 12, 2018. Though the views and analysis presented here are my own, I want to acknowledge Dr. Taube’s important contribution to my thinking on these issues.
P
Notes
[1] In January 1892, Larz made the first of several visits to Hardwick House in Oxfordshire, the country home of the Anglo-Canadian businessman, racehorse breeder, yachtsman, and British Liberal Party politician, Sir Charles Day Rose (1847-1913). Author Kenneth Grahame used Sir Charles as the inspiration for the Wind in the Willows character, Mr. Toad, and set the story at Hardwick House.
[2] Larz’s knowledge of and appreciation for Italian art, architecture, and garden design far exceeded his interest in either English or French culture. Indeed, his deep appreciation of Italian culture was a theme throughout the course of his adult life, as documented in my full-length biography of the Andersons, Larz and Isabel Anderson: Wealth and Celebrity in the Gilded Age.
Pierre Lorillard’s houseboat “Caiman”, pictured here in a watercolor published in 1893 in The Illustrated American. (Source: Google Books.)
We often associate yachts and steamships with Gilded Age vacations and recreation, but did you know that houseboats were also once the “in” thing for wealthy boaters like Pierre Lorillard, Alfred Gwynn Vanderbilt, and William Payne Whitney? By the late 1890s, houseboating had become very popular both in the U.S. and in England, in part because the craft were easy to moor near shore or river’s edge, and served as the ultimate party boat. Reports of large parties aboard Lorillard’s craft the Caiman appeared regularly in society columns. Indeed, according to a New York Times article in August 1901, it was Lorillard’s Caiman that set the standard for “the luxurious life” aboard such watercraft. Larger craft such as Lorillard’s included as many as twelve to fifteen sleeping rooms, parlor, dining room, smoking room, and were often accompanied by a second boat that housed the kitchen and the staff.
John Warne Gates, commissioner and first owner of Larz Anderson’s houseboat, the “Roxana.” (Source: Wikimedia)
Millionaire John Warne “Bet-a-Million” Gates (1855–1911) was one of hundreds of men who commissioned a bespoke houseboat. Gates, a self-made man without much of an education, started out life as a barbed-wire salesman in Texas. He made plenty of money both in his business ventures and at casino tables. When he commissioned the Roxana from the Racine Boat Manufacturing Company, he wanted something of modest size. The vessel measured 112 feet long and 17 feet across and had a 4.5-foot draft. (In contrast, Lorillard’s Caiman was 132 feet long and 26 feet across and had a 5.5-foot draft.) Gates named his houseboat for Roxana, the wife of Alexander the Great, a fitting name for the pleasure craft of a king of industry.
John Warne Gates’s Roxana, built in 1904 by the Racine Boat Manufacturing Company, and sold to Larz Anderson around 1907 after a trial rental in 1906. This undated photograph, showing Larz and his wife Isabel at the prow of the boat, was published in Harper’s Bazar in May, 1917.
Gates did not enjoy the Roxana for long. He spent two summers aboard the houseboat, in 1904 and 1905, and then appeared to grow tired of it. In 1906, he and his son, who were in business together, dissolved their New York City investment company in 1906, just ahead of the 1907 panic. They moved to Paris in 1907, where the elder Gates died four years later. His obituary noted he had been “adroit” in responding to stock market conditions, citing his decision to withdraw from the New York Stock Exchange at a time when the market was expanding rapidly.
Ambassador and Mrs. Larz Anderson, portrait by Philip De László (1926). Anderson House, Washington, DC. (Photo by Skip Moskey 2018.)
When Larz Anderson first inspected the Roxana in early 1906 as a possible summer rental, it was boarded up at a marina in New York City. Gates agreed to lease the vessel to him with an option to buy it, which Larz did the following year. The Andersons frequently wintered aboard the Roxana, cruising lazily along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of Florida. They enjoyed everything connected to Florida waters, especially swimming and canoeing. One time they paddled their little boat around the coral islands near Caesar’s Creek in what is now Biscayne National Park. They marveled at the ocean bottom visible through the clear water and went diving for sponges. The couple loved to fish and did so often. Larz was thrilled to catch many varieties—herring, mackerel, red snapper, and grouper—and had their cook, a local whom he’d hired in Miami, prepare them for meals.
Menu for a luncheon aboard the Roxana, June 25, 1907. (Anderson House, Washington, DC).
Like Lorillard and others, the Andersons entertained extensively aboard the Roxana. On June 25, 1907, when the boat was anchored near Annapolis, their cook served a mouthwatering luncheon that proved the galley’s catering standards equal to an Anderson kitchen on terra firma: frothy consommé, ramekin of poached egg with a cheese crust, buttered lobster in wine sauce, veal cutlets, asparagus with cream sauce, punch sorbet, and a cake named after Joan of Arc.
Larz and Isabel owned the Roxana for two decades, though they used it in only thirteen of those years. They did not use it in 1912 when Larz was US minister to Belgium, and they suspended cruising during the years US troops fought in World War I (1917–1918). Despite these breaks, the Andersons’ most regular use of the boat occurred before 1920. After 1920, the novelty of the houseboat had worn off, and eventually Larz came to prefer more-exotic itineraries than the Roxana could provide.
The last remaining pieces of the Roxana’s table service. A salad plate, a saucer, an oyster fork, and a demi-tasse spoon. The red pennant with the black horse device was the Andersons’s signal flown on the Roxana. (Private Family Collection. Photo by Skip Moskey.)
In 1927, Larz decided they would no longer use the Roxana, yet he found it difficult to let go of it. Larz “had a very strong sentiment about selling anything that he had enjoyed,” his business manager once said. Larz’s first impulse for disposing of the houseboat was “taking her out to sea and sinking her,” but Isabel objected. (After all, it had been her money that paid for the boat.) Larz eventually gave the Roxana to Captain Isaac Golden, who lived in Rhode Island, and kept him on the Anderson payroll for the rest of his life so that he could care for the vessel.
When Larz later wrote the history of how ownership of the houseboat had passed to Golden, he omitted the part about wanting to sink it.
One of the Roxana’s wicker chairs that was moved to Isabel Anderson’s camp in New Hampshire before Larz gave the houseboat to Captain Isaac Golden. Isabel herself painted the originally natural wicker this color blue. (Photo by Skip Moskey.)
Postscript: The fate of the Roxana after Captain Golden’s death in 1942 is unknown. Extensive searches and inquiries with nautical history organization in Rhode Island; attempts to locate Golden’s descendants, if any; and searches of newspaper records have not turned up even one clue. If you have a suggestion for how the Roxana’s fate might be determined, please let me know
Full technical information about the Roxana follows:
Official No.: 200436 Signal Letters: KSRM Rig. St. s. Decks 1 Masts 1 Gross tonnage. 132 Net tonnage. 74 Length. 112.2 (feet) Breadth. 17.0 (feet) Depth. 4.5 When built. 1903